Assessment and Reporting in 1996

Thoughts on Colin Marsh’s 1996 chapter on Assessment and Reporting, in Handbook for Beginning Teachers. (Summary in Prezi)

The concepts of Objective Assessment and Authentic Tasks are now (14 years later) well established and normative. However, learner involvement in planning assessment is still minimal in school classrooms that I have seen.

Ideas to involve learners in planning assessment, online

In Moodle

Create a Glossary activity. As an ‘assessment for learning’ (or formative feedback) it might go like this:

  1. Each student is to submit one question (as the card title) and marking criteria (as the card body), tagging it with the curriculum objective (as a keyword).
  2. Each student is to answer a number of other students’ questions (as a comment).
  3. Each student is to score (using comment ratings) several students’ answers.
  4. Teacher is to add a model answer (as a comment) to each question, and guide discussion of the questions with most divergent answers.

In Google Wave

Invite students to a Wave.

  1. include links to stimulus material and links to reference tools.
  2. pose a question
  3. after student answers begin to develop, add a poll to check the understanding of the lurkers. (Voting widgets)

In GoogleDocs

Create a form.

  1. In the description include links to stimulus material and links to reference tools.
  2. Use a Textbox question to ask students to suggest a question.
  3. Use tickboxes to ask students to confirm their perception of their own readiness for testing on each advertised criteria.
  4. Hide the summary of results from respondents.
  5. Distribute the form to class.
  6. Use the results spreadsheet to collate the contributed questions.

References

Marsh, C 1996 Handbook for beginning teachers, Addison Wesley Longman, South Melbourne, pp.213-233.

Other Polling gadgets. http://sites.google.com/site/polloforwave/alternatives

ClearCheckbook

Suitability:

CONCEPT DEMO

ClearCheckBook is safe for experiments – it doesn’t communicate directly with banks – but I wouldn’t recommend it for personal use. It just takes too long to work between email, ClearCheckbook and the banks, and without email reminders it is too easy to miss a bill payment.

ClearCheckbook dashboard

ClearCheckbook dashboard

Roadtest

It took minutes to create the account, and about 2 days to import or key in bank statements totalling 600 lines over 8 accounts (an excessive starting body). For teaching purposes, I would guide students through creating one credit card account, one cheque account and one cash account, and supply files representing two monthly bank statements (of 6-20 lines) for each account.

With only the instructions on the ClearCheckbook website and forum, it took about two more days to explore its capabilities. This could probably be collapsed to a couple of hours by sensible exclusions and explicit instruction.

One interesting point: the author warns against putting real account details into the system. They are not necessary, because ClearCheckBook is only managing records, not moving funds.

Access

  • Register online for the free version,  sufficient for most.
  • $4 USD per month by credit card for the premium version providing “running balances, mass editing, projecting future balances, transaction histories and more.

Platform

Good

  • Data in the cloud means no software installation, no backup, and easy account sharing.
  • Bill reminders (optionally) come by email, an adjustable number of days in advance.
  • I got a next-day response from the developer to a query in the user forum.
  • It handles multiple bank accounts and credit cards, and budget limits by category.
  • Repeating and floating bill reminders at very flexible intervals.
  • Transactions can be posted via AOL, SMS, ICQ, Yahoo! Messenger or Google Talk.

Bad

  • No control over period dates, no running balance in the Estimate Future Balances feature and no data dump for future transactions.
  • Dates are imported as US dates.
  • Rows from imported bank statements get an annoying prefix.
  • Past (i.e. overdue) bill reminders are hidden by default.
  • Reconciliation is hard work.
  • The cashflow line graph is easy to misinterpret as net balance vs time. (It is actually monthly income and expense in each month, not cumulative.)
  • One word (Jive) stands for the two distinct ideas: clearing (cheques) and reconciling (statement transactions). There are occasions where this is not clear.
  • No audit trail.

References

https://www.clearcheckbook.com

http://www.ehow.com/how_2091789_use-clearcheckbook.html

Roadtest

It took minutes to create the account, and about 2 days to import or key in bank statements totalling 600 lines (approximately 6 months) over 8 accounts. 600 lines was excessive. For teaching purposes, I would guide students through creating one credit card account, one cheque account and one cash account, and supply files representing two monthly bank statements for each account.

With only the instructions on the ClearCheckbook website and forum, it took about two more days to explore its capabilities. This could probably be collapsed to a couple of hours by sensible exclusions and explicit instruction.

Access

  • Register online for the free version,  sufficient for most.
  • $4 USD per month by credit card for the premium version providing “running balances, mass editing, projecting future balances, transaction histories and more.

Platform